The risks of cybersecurity tool sprawl, and why we need consolidation

New threats emerge every week, and many vendors respond with narrow, reactive solutions. The result? Tool sprawl. Some organizations now rely on anywhere from 45 to 83 separate cybersecurity tools.

This fragmented approach drives up costs, complicates workflows, and increases risk due to poor integration and limited visibility.

Business leaders are taking notice:

The message is clear: it’s time to shift from being reactive to a more unified, strategic approach to cybersecurity.

The negative effects of tool and vendor sprawl

The negative effects of tool and vendor sprawl on costs, productivity, and risk profiles are well documented. But sometimes business leaders don’t understand the full breadth of their potential downsides:

What’s next?

Tool sprawl is a growing problem, but it’s also a solvable one. With the right strategy, organizations can reduce risk, streamline operations, and unlock real cost savings.

Coming up in part two of this blog, we’ll map out how to get started with cybersecurity consolidation, from aligning key teams to auditing your tooling landscape and identifying high-impact changes. Stay tuned.

Learn more

Organizational leaders must push their cybersecurity, engineering, and infrastructure operations teams to reduce complexity by centralizing and consolidating on a handful of security platforms rather than a litany of smaller cybersecurity tools.

We’ve seen Roche and many other companies run successful cybersecurity product consolidation initiatives, and we’d love to share more insights. We’ve reduced risk for thousands of companies, including Vodafone, Deutsche Bank, Canva, and more.

Download Secure by design: How to reduce cloud risk and maintain compliance to learn how we can consolidate the number of Security Lifecycle Management tools you use.